Monday, June 30, 2014

Iceland Impressions - Culture

I'm not sure if "culture" is the right word here; this is just a collection of my perceptions of what Icelanders think and do. Our 10-day trip was my first outside of Asia and North America, and it was long enough for some interesting observations.

Low Consumption of Resources
Perhaps due to the small population of residents and tourists, everything appeared to be on a smaller scale than what we were used to in the states or even in Taiwan, including convenience stores, supermarkets, hotels, and museums.

The first photo below was the Whale Museum in Husavik, which seemed to to be a converted warehouse of some sort, with the hand-painted cartoon whales on the walls. This cute little building was definitely not what I had expected to see in this famous whale watching harbor town. But then we saw the Seal Museum in a famous seal-watching peninsula, which turned out to be a tiny room inside a small building, and realized that the Whale Museum was actually gigantic!

Most of the exhibits in the national museum system were historic sites, such as the turf houses in the second photo below. Only the Iceland National Museum in Reykjavik resembles the stereotypical idea of a "museum" (third photo below).




At the supermarket or regular store check-out, there was no bagging service so you either bring your bag or get one of their tiny thin plastic bags yourself. Over the 10-day trip, I don't remember seeing any Styrofoam product for food or drink. The majority of the automobiles on the road were the smallest models from various makers and rarely did I see any car from a luxury brand, not even in the capital city. My overall impression was that the whole lifestyle was geared toward conservation of resources.

Interestingly, the largest man-made structures we saw were the geothermal power plants, including the one in the photos below near the volcanic crater Viti. The geology of Iceland offers an abundance of the natural energy source, at least more than sufficient to support the Icelandic population. From what we could see, residents outside of the capital city maintained a rather simple farming/ranching lifestyle anyway. As tourists, we were definitely grateful that the numerous majestic waterfalls were not tapped for power generation. 



Clean and Neat 
The restrooms (called WC or toilet) were not always present at the places we visited, but all of them were spotless and stink-free regardless of how remote the locations were. This is a (good) departure from what we are used to in the National Park System in the states, but the responsibilities rest, with the tourists as much as the National Park Services.

Below are two of the cute restrooms we "visited" on the trip. The first set of restroom stalls (triangles on the left) were located in a small island with no permanent residents, specifically for the use by the tourist group coming to visit on the daily boat tour. I was really surprised to find it as clean as possible because that meant that somebody had to be driving a boat for about an hour each way to clean the stalls regularly!

The restroom in the second photo below had a funny shape and a retro-styled turf roof where grass and flowers were allowed to grow, which should have kept the restroom relatively warm in the winter and cool under the summer sun. 



Another observation was that all of the eating places were also spotless and do not smell like food or anything else. I suspect that it was at least partly due to the less greasy cooking style of Icelandic cuisine. But it's obvious that the overall standard for cleanliness is just higher in Iceland than in all other countries I have been to.

In my other post about the food experience in Iceland, I included some photos of the restaurants we went to. Here are the pictures I took of the breakfast rooms at some of our hotels around the island.






Trust
For lack of a better word,I'm calling this section "trust," as in the opposite of excessive concern about certain things.

In contrast to the standard of hygiene for the dining rooms, Icelanders don't seem to be as concerned about germs from the human hands. Whenever bread is offered in the buffet (for breakfast or dinner), no serving utensils were provided. I guess it's reasonable to expect every guest to refrain from touching any piece of bread that he/she is not taking. But when the whole loaf of bread was served, I had no choice but to hold the loaf with one hand while using the knife with the other. Having been "well-trained" in Taiwan and the states, I couldn't help but feel guilty to be contaminating the loaf with my germs! At the same time, though, it infused me with a sense of nostalgia for the simpler way of life when people didn't have to guard against one another so much, and when the store keeper would take my saved-up coins and hand me the bulk candy in an old dusty jar.

In the picture below, we were on our way back to the hard on the whale-watching boat. We were offered hot chocolate and cinnamon rolls as it was pretty cold and we had been at sea for 3 hours. You can see that the tour guide was serving the rolls by hand. 


In a few places frequented by tourists, we saw little donation jars for people to chip in for nature/history conservation or service enhancement but they were left in public places with no supervision whatsoever. One of them was on the shelve in a restroom stall, with the whole lid open and nothing inside. But the others I saw were not empty.

On our eighth night, we stayed at a little inn, probably converted from a private residence. The hostess had left for home before we arrived that night, so she left the front door to the building open and left us a note with the room key on the counter. 

I suspect that these trusting behaviors may be somewhat related to the fact that Iceland has long been a small country with a small population. If people know one another, they may behave better and expect others to behave similarly based on the common social norms. 

As tourists, we felt completely independent and free to do what we wanted wherever we went. The Icelanders clearly value freedom more than the need to restrict tourists' behaviors for safety. In other words, they trust the tourists to protect themselves! For example, there was no fencing at any coastal cliff, tall waterfall, or canyon walls. I probably would have had numerous panic attacks if we brought little kids to any of those places, where the possibilities of accidents were endless. Some of our photos make those places look rather scary afterwards...





                        
Communicating with pictures
I may be imagining things here, but I think the Icelanders love to communicate with pictures. Take road signs as examples, a lot of them had no words (in any language) and thus require some imagination on the part of the interpreter.

We drove past this cute little dragon sign posted by a lake. Along with the picnic sign, I interpreted it to mean: Here's a good spot for having a picnic while looking at the lake, which is the lake where the monster was said to reside. Somebody on the internet offered an alternative interpretation: This is a good spot for having a picnic while observing the lake monster. 


On the first day, we drove by a couple small towns and noticed this sign below, with the houses and church crossed out. No settlement allowed?


Then we started to pay more attention and realized that the sign below would appear as we entered the boundary of a town/village, and then the sign above would appear as we left the town boundary!  We also concluded that the signs for different towns were the same, with the same number of houses and a church, regardless of how big the town was. But on the last day, we saw that the city boundary sign for the capital city, Reykjavik, had one additional house in the sign! After all, almost 3/4 of the Icelanders do live in the capital.


Once we know what the city/town boundary signs mean, it is now possible to interpret the partially obstructed sign above, behind the "end of town" sign. I found a complete version from the web to explain, see below.

During our ten-day driving tour, we saw this warning sign below many times. Fortunately it was pretty straight forward: Single-lane narrow bridge ahead! Once you pass the sign, there will be a passing point where the shoulder is slightly wider for you to wait for the on-coming car to cross the bridge first.


The set of signs in the picture below is not as clear to me. By now I knew that the symbol similar to a four-leave clover in the middle indicated a landmark or place of interest. The top graph might mean that only pedestrians and bicycles can continue forward (but not motor vehicles). But does it apply to the trail on the left or the one on the right? The left trail led to a private rancher's property but there was a passage way to get to the historic turf houses site. The right trail actually led directly to the historic site. Finally, the bottom graph was really puzzling to me: Only pedestrians can take the right trail? 

Sometimes the signs do have English, like the one below. Clearly the graphic representation of the fecal matter was not necessary but an attempt for comic effects? We've only seen this once on the trip.


When the words on a sign were Icelandic, of course the picture becomes crucial for us, such as the one below. The meaning of this gigantic sign was clear enough, but I did not notice the number printed on the cross at the time. According to some sources I found, it is the accumulated number of people died from car accidents in the current year in the whole country.


Playing with rocks
If I have to pick the most impressive feature of Icelandic beauty, I would say it's the rocks. The most awe-inspiring places to me were the rock formations and creations that became canyons, cliffs, and contours of the mountains. It was the unique rocky background that distinguished each of the Icelandic waterfalls.

But rocks on a much smaller scale were interesting in Iceland as well. They were like the national toys! A restaurant owner displays the heart-shaped rock collection in the first two pictures; the enormous glacier deity was built with rocks in the third photo.





Hikers know how critical the cairns can be in staying on track when the trails are not clear. The convention is that hikers would add rocks to the cairns as continuous maintenance of the trail markers. Bob loves doing it and often challenges himself with difficult stacks.



In one particular place, the Icelanders have taken the cairn building tradition to a new height. At the site of an ancient farm that was destroyed (more than a thousand years ago) by a the first eruption of volcano Katla, each Icelander passing by the site for the first time was supposed to contribute one rock to a cairn as a gesture of wishing the dead good luck in their journey after life. The Iceland road administration regularly transports new rocks to this site so that modern tourists can continue the tradition!




There were also more realistic rock stacks that resemble human or animal shapes. Some of them were simplistic, as in the first two photos below, others were mind-boggling, such as the one in the third picture, captured from a far distance while we were driving to the airport on the last day. The rocks must have been huge so how did people move them around to stack them?




Bob had the most fun stacking rocks on the eighth day when we visited a famous rock arch by the coast. As we approached the rocky beach, I saw many big white birds standing on a group of black rocks by the beach. But then I realized that the completely still white birds were actually stones standing freely on their pointy ends. Driven by my curiosity, I touched one of the standing rocks and broke its balance! Oops!!

After Bob had taken enough photos of the stone arch, he came over to try his hand on making rocks stand. He got it rather quickly and soon started to add to the existing collection with rocks that were increasingly difficult to balance. In the end, he restored the one I knocked down and created a two-rock creation with a small one on top of a larger one.

This was the existing collection when we arrived there.



My guilty look after knocking down a balanced rock

Some of Bob's contributions



The collection as we left it

I captured a few of the rock stacking attempts on video, including this one below:



Sunday, June 29, 2014

冰島之旅的印象 - 人文篇

冰島之行是我第一次親身體驗亞洲和美洲以外的國家,十天雖然不很長,但是對冰島的人文頗有一點感想。

資源用量低
或許是因為冰島人口少,而觀光人數也還算少,感覺上很多東西規模都很小。從便利商店,超級市場,旅館,到博物館,不但和美國的規模差很遠,甚至比台灣的規模還小。下面照片裡的鯨魚博物館就是一棟普通的房子,還手繪卡通鯨魚壁畫,很出乎我意料之外。後來才知道這還算大的,因為海豹博物館只是一棟房子裡的一小間房間,還沒什麼隔間裝璜。只有位於首都市區的冰島國家博物館比較有點規模。絕大多數的所謂博物館(museum)就是幾棟老草皮屋,讓人體驗早期冰島人的生活空間。




在普通商店或超市買東西時店員並不會用塑膠袋裝貨品,如果你需要,可以自己拿來裝,但是也只供應很小很薄的透明塑膠袋。整趟旅行下來,我不記得看到過任何保利龍產品盛裝飲食。路上跑的絕大多數都是最小型的汽車,一路上沒有看到什麼名牌(luxury brand)車,即使在首都雷克雅未克也極少見。整體給我的感覺是能源的使用非常節制。

我們所見最大的人造設施大概是地熱發電場,照片裡是其中的一座。因為冰島的地理本質,這種天然資源豐富,供給冰島用電似乎綽綽有餘。不過或許也是因為人口少,而首都以外的居民似乎過著很簡單的農牧生活。作為觀光客,我們自然很高興冰島豐沛的地熱能源讓他們不必破壞那些壯觀的瀑布來截取水力發電。




整潔乾淨
雖然我們停留之景點並不一定有廁所,但是只要有廁所,不管多麼荒郊野外,廁所都極其乾淨。這一點連美國的國家公園都做不到。不過這有點像拿橘子比蘋果,因為不但管理單位有責任,使用的民眾更有責任。如果觀光客又多又雜,恐怕管理單位就很難好好維護廁所整潔。
以下照片裡是一些可愛造形的冰島廁所。我印象最深刻的廁所是在一個沒有永久居民的離島上(第一張照片左側兩個尖尖的),供給一天一班船的遊客團使用,竟然也非常乾淨,這表示有人必須經常開船近一個小時過去打掃!第二張照片是在一個峽谷邊上,屋頂仿古,任花草生長,保持廁所裡冬暖夏涼!

左邊的是廁所

廁所屋頂有花草

另外一個感想就是餐廳都窗明几淨,或許跟冰島烹飪較不油膩有點關係?印象裡最特別的是各個旅館免費提供早餐的地方佈置得各有風格,又乾淨舒適。下面的照片是一些例子。





對人的信任
相對於餐廳的整潔,讓我有點驚訝的是,每當早餐或自助餐有麵包供應的時候,我們都只能直接用手拿,沒有人供應夾子或其他器皿!所以冰島人顯然認為不會有人隨便亂拿亂摸,只會取用自己需要的。有時候麵包整條放在盤子裡讓人自己切,也只好就用手去扶著麵包切,在台灣和美國小心慣了,還真覺得不好意思自己的手「汙染」了別人也要吃的麵包。但是同時又覺得冰島人這樣不緊張的態度似乎比較自然。照片裡是我們的賞鯨船,回程路上為遊客準備了肉桂麵包捲和熱可可,播音小姐也就直接用手抓麵包捲一個一個分給大家!

有幾次在景點看到捐款小罐子,上面懇請遊客樂捐協助他們保存古蹟或改善設備,但是罐子小小的就隨便擺在沒有人看守的地方,有的甚至放在廁所裡,顯然不認為罐子會連捐款一起不翼而飛。其中一個在女廁裡的,連整個蓋子都開著,但是裡面空空如也,要不是沒人捐款就是已經被人佔為己有。

旅途第八天,我們下榻的小旅店像是一個民宅改裝成的。我們開車抵達時,女主人已經回家了,但是大門沒有鎖,我們房間的鑰匙就留在櫃檯桌上,她寫了張條子要我們自己拿鑰匙入房,有事再打電話給她。

這些作為,或許和他們國小人稀有點關係,傳統上可能冰島人認為反正大家互相認識,大概不敢做什麼壞事。除了信任他人的道德行為以外,似乎也信任他人的判斷力足夠自求多福。舉例而言,我們去的地方實在都蠻危險的,大大小小壯觀的峽谷和瀑布,幾乎完全沒有欄桿等安全設施,如果我帶了兒童同遊,大概很快就會驚嚇過度,因為所有的景點都有無數種可能發生的意外!有些照片我們事後看起來都覺得有點可怕。。。




                        
看圖說故事
這一點或許是我自己的偏見,不過我覺得冰島人很愛使用圖解的方式傳達訊息。以路上看到的標誌為例,很多連一個字都沒有,所以需要一點想像力去詮釋。

這個可愛的龍標誌樹立在湖邊的一條公路旁,連帶著上方那個野餐觀景點的圖。我想它是說:這裡適合野餐看湖景,而這個湖就是傳說有湖怪的地方。我看到網路上有另一個人解釋:在這裡野餐比較容易觀察到湖怪出沒!

頭一天我們開車經過小鎮時,先注意到下面第一個路邊標誌,很疑惑為什麼好像把房子劃掉,不知道代表什麼。

後來小心觀察,才發現剛進入小鎮範圍時,會先有下面這個標誌,然後即將出城時就會有上面那個標誌,表示我們已經駛出小鎮的範圍。最後一天回到首都時,還發現進入城市範圍的圖比其他小鎮多畫了一間房子,代表是大城吧?!


了解了這兩個城鎮範圍的牌子以後,也就可以詮釋一些比較複雜的路邊標誌。像是上面那個被擋住一半的牌子。我從網路上找到一個完整的來解釋。
我們十天環島開車一路看到下面這個警告標誌很多次,還好這個圖算是容易解讀的:前面有單行道的橋!看到圖之後就會有一處路肩比較寬,讓後到的車先停下來讓對面的車先過橋。

但是下面這一串牌子就不是非常明瞭。中間的四葉草是表示此處有名勝或景點。上方的大人小孩和腳踏車大概是說只有這些可以繼續前行的意思,但是應該走左邊還是右邊呢?左邊其實是通到一戶農家的庭園,然後才能繞到所指的景點(是一區草皮屋的古蹟),右邊是直接通往古蹟的小路,但是下方的圖又只畫大人小孩往右走,是說腳踏車不能走這條小路嗎?

有時候標誌上有清楚文字(英文),所以圖變得不是很必要,像下面這個標誌,只有看過一次,有點好笑。

如果牌子上的文字只有冰島文,圖對我們來說當然就非常重要,像下面這個相當大的牌子就很直接了當,提醒行車人繫安全帶。不過當時我沒有注意到十字架上的數字,回來後看到網路上有人解說冰島路牌,才知道是當年車禍死亡的人數(應該是全國的統計)

愛玩石頭
如果硬要挑選冰島最最特殊的景觀,我想我會說是岩石。幾乎所有讓我最受震撼和感動的景色都是因為岩石的極致構圖,在我眼中,也是因為背後絕妙的岩壁讓冰島的無數瀑布如此動人。但是比較小的石頭也有很多妙處,變成了冰島特殊的玩具。



常健行的人知道石堆是用來當路標的,尤其是不明顯的步道真的很需要靠沿路的石堆才不會迷失方向。慣例上,健行者會添加一石,以維持沿路的路標,老公也常忍不住摻一腳,尤其是具有挑戰性的石堆。我們在冰島走的步道都還算明顯,但是仍然有人堆石頭。

合作石堆的概念在冰島一處得以登峰造極。一千多年前,Katla火山第一次爆發時淹沒了一座農場,後來人們在路過這個農場舊址時都在石堆上添上一石,祝亡者“一路順風”。冰島公路管理局現在負責運石頭到這裡,讓今日的旅客能夠延續這個古老的傳統。


這次在冰島還看到很多人形或動物的堆石,有的很簡單,像下面頭兩張照片,有的則不是普通的難,像第三張照片是我們開往機場的路上看到遠處山坡上的人形堆石,想必是巨石堆的,那怎麼有人抬得動呢?



老公玩堆石頭遊戲最過癮是在第八天傍晚,我們抵達一個著名的礁石海岸欣賞一個矗立海上的石拱門。開始往海邊走時,我看見一座黑礁石上似乎停了很多白鳥,但是那些白鳥半天都不動,我才發現那些是白石頭,巧妙地立在黑礁石上。後來我很好奇這些石頭如何能以尖端立著,趨近觸摸其中一粒,它竟然隨即倒下,原來完全是靠石頭本身重心的平衡站立!我頓時充滿罪惡感,把一個石頭弄倒,怎麼也無法恢復它的立姿。老公拍攝完石拱門後也忍不住過來學立石頭,結果竟然馬上成功,接連立了好幾顆大大小小奇形怪狀的石頭,最後還自己挑戰自己,在一個立石頂上再平衡一粒小石頭,而且也把我破壞的那顆還原立姿。

原來已存在的立石景象



我弄倒立石的驚慌

思蔚貢獻了他的創作之後的景象




我還捕捉了幾次立石的過程,這是其中一次