Monday, July 7, 2014

如果我住在煤礦峽谷邊上

前天我們趁著探訪幾處原住民古蹟的機會,順道重遊煤礦峽谷(Coal Mine Canyon)。對老公來說是重遊,我則是第一次親眼見到。



話說上回帶著爸媽去看Hopi族原住民的古老壁畫(petroglyphs)和生活環境時,也曾經想一探煤礦峽谷的美。



老公從網路上聽說這個地方,是因為有不少精通美國西南部的人提供了照片和所在的方位。可是當天我們還是走錯了路,因為都是屬於原住民的自治區裡的土路,沒有任何標示。最後雖然也逼近一個峽谷,但是我的車輪不幸陷入軟泥裡,動彈不得。
 

最後我靠著微弱的電話訊號求救,附近小鎮上的拖車服務才在日落前把我的車子拉出來。為了確定拖車的人找得到我們,老公自己走大老遠到離大馬路比較近的地方,爸媽和我站在車附近看著夕陽西下,氣溫也隨之而降。最後一天啟程回家以前,老公說他弄清了方向,一大早要再去尋找煤礦峽谷,我就決定和爸媽待在旅館等他,心想不要再讓爸媽跟著冒險。其實前一天我們已經在原住民蓋瑞和他四輪傳動的車帶領下,見到一個非常珍貴的藍峽谷(Blue Canyon)。







結果思蔚是找到了煤礦峽谷,只是天氣陰雨,沒能好好攝影,還是有點遺憾。這次我們住的旅館離那個峽谷大約一小時車程,而且天氣晴朗,才決定再去一次。(這次開了四輪傳動的車和野外專用的導航定位器,不怕迷路!)女兒一下車就驚歎不已,直問為什麼這樣大這樣美的峽谷,卻沒有人來欣賞。我們抵達的時候沒有其他人,後來我們在峽谷旁走走時,才有另一車來,不過只站在邊上遠望一下就離開了。停車的地方也是沙石地,旁邊有一些水泥野餐桌和烤肉架,除此之外沒有任何公共設施或標誌。但是就在停車場邊有一戶人家飼養了一些牛,雖然有鐵絲網把野餐桌和牧場簡單隔開,牛還是常常跑到峽谷邊上,留下很多痕跡(牛糞)。牛看到我們似乎沒有受到驚嚇,只是很注意地盯著我們看。

我回來以後反覆思考小嵐問的問題,為什麼原住民自治政府不規畫這些自然景觀來經營觀光業,或者像美國政府那樣管理國家公園讓世人共享?如果我住在煤礦峽谷邊上,我會怎麼想?

最近看了一些美國原住民的著作和關於原住民文化的書,覺得有了一些領悟。雖然各族族人已多少融入西方文化(有時候是不得已的),他們到現在都還是努力要保留他們獨特的觀點,基本上就是要和自然共存,尋求一種平衡。煤礦峽谷處於Hopi和Navajo兩族的屬地之間,據說Hopi族人自古就到煤礦峽谷採取煤礦使用,想必也體念到保護這個資源的重要性。而各族一向尊敬美麗的自然景觀,甚至授予超自然的神力,Navajo族的一種祈禱文就是期許自己行於美境中:
In beauty I walk
With beauty before me I walk
With beauty behind me I walk
With beauty around me I walk
With beauty above me I walk
With beauty below me I walk

既然這些原住民族長久居住在美國西南部(包括亞利桑那州和新墨西哥州)這片土地上,他們絕對比我更體驗到這些絕妙自然景觀的脆弱。我們過去一年裡探訪過的煤礦峽谷,藍峽谷,和新墨西哥州境內受天然侵蝕的荒地(badlands),都是因為地質成份特別,顏色和軟硬程度有別,經過風化雨蝕形成極富藝術感的景觀。在新墨西哥州的一區荒地,我就曾經因為站得太靠近一些石柱,驚見石柱的一角化為沙而落地!那個地區尚未正式規畫入美國國家公園的管理系統,還屬於研究階段。我們艱苦循土石狹路去過之後,我就開始誠心希望它永遠不會成為正式的觀光區,不然很快這些景緻就會消失無蹤了。






現在我自覺或許對原住民族的心態有了一點體認。如果我住在煤礦峽谷邊上,我會希望能夠一直和這片自然奇景共存,當然人人都可以來體驗它的美,但是我也不會想設立牌子舖平道路吸引大批的觀光客,一來公共設施會破壞原始的大自然,二來觀光客多了就會威脅到峽谷和我家園的原貌。目前的狀態或許是最佳的一種妥協:任何人都可以進入原住民的自治區,但是如果想在某些地點健行或露營就需要申請許可證(酌收一點費用,和進入國家公園差不多)。很多地區必須由原住民嚮導帶領才能深入探訪。帶我們去藍峽谷和原始壁畫區的蓋瑞是Hopi和Navajo的混血,對兩族文化有特別深刻的體驗和理解,我們像上了一課最棒的原住民歷史文化。下方照片裡是蓋瑞和載我們到藍峽谷的休旅車。

其實再想想,冰島人的心態似乎也很像美國原住民族,所有的景點都只有很小的牌子,和普通的小路路牌差不多,很多地方也沒有任何公共設施,而我們最近尋訪的某些地點還是靠網路上的有心人士分享經驗才找得到。即使現在觀光業是冰島的一大經濟來源,我還是感覺到一種保存原始自然的堅持,冰島人自古與自然共存的文化心態似乎仍然生生不息。



Wednesday, July 2, 2014

冰島之旅的印象 - 瀑布篇

冰島瀑布不計其數,因為到處都有峭壁,山上的水只要沿著山壁流下來,就很難不令人眼睛一亮。我們此行環島一週,並沒能看完所有著名的瀑布,但是也額外欣賞了很多不知名(或者從未命名)的瀑布。

我在冰島時有很多次深刻的感動。不只是普通欣賞風景的美感體驗,而是有一種切身的覺醒,單純地意識到自己在那一刻間的存在,沒有任何其他念頭或牽掛。這種經驗有兩次發生在瀑布景點。

若隱若現的Gljúfurárfoss (Gljúfrabúi waterfall)

這個瀑布其實是計劃中的“附帶”景點,因為主要目的地是著名的Seljalandsfoss。Seljalandsfoss從公路邊上就可以看見,而且可以從360度不同角度觀賞。




從這個瀑布再沿著野花遍佈的步道走十幾二十分鐘才會看到Gljúfurárfoss,途中會經過一個小瀑布和一個山洞。


剛到Gljúfurárfoss時我很失望,因為只能從山縫裡看到一點點瀑布頂,後來發現山縫是走得過去的,就把雨衣帽子帶上,開始往裡面走。

進入山縫裡面對的40公尺高的充沛水簾,是一個非常奇妙的經驗,當時只有我一個人站在那裡,決定自拍留下紀念,以後可以回味。


後來思蔚進來後,又為我照了幾張相。水勢之強,我們的相機和手機都來不及擦乾。



溯溪尋訪Skógafoss的源頭

大名頂頂的Skógafoss著實壯觀,而且可以走到很近的地方感受它的氣勢。這個瀑布有60公尺高,很久以前是Skóga河入海的地方,而這山壁原先是海岸的懸崖,現在則離海相當遠了。


這個瀑布最吸引我的地方是旁邊的步道,不僅可以爬到瀑布頂邊遠眺瀑布下游蜿蜒的河道,而且可以繼續往河的上游,欣賞Skóga河從冰河流下來所造成的23個大小瀑布。可惜我的左膝不太行,走過幾個瀑布之後就停下來,讓老公自己繼續往前再走一段,多看了一個瀑布。我坐在河谷山壁邊上等的時候,真的覺得我可以就這樣在那裡一直坐一整天。










這條步道走完Skóga河的源頭之後,可以一直穿過兩座冰河中間的山脊,不過路變得難走,而且必須至少在途中過一夜,因此隨身需要背睡袋等等,我恐怕無法把體力和膝蓋練到那種登山陟嶺的能耐,不過很希望有機會至少把Skóga河路探盡,看完23道瀑布!




這幾個瀑布都在冰島南邊,所以還蠻容易到達,即使停留時間不長也一定可以安排在行程裡。






Monday, June 30, 2014

Iceland Impressions - Culture

I'm not sure if "culture" is the right word here; this is just a collection of my perceptions of what Icelanders think and do. Our 10-day trip was my first outside of Asia and North America, and it was long enough for some interesting observations.

Low Consumption of Resources
Perhaps due to the small population of residents and tourists, everything appeared to be on a smaller scale than what we were used to in the states or even in Taiwan, including convenience stores, supermarkets, hotels, and museums.

The first photo below was the Whale Museum in Husavik, which seemed to to be a converted warehouse of some sort, with the hand-painted cartoon whales on the walls. This cute little building was definitely not what I had expected to see in this famous whale watching harbor town. But then we saw the Seal Museum in a famous seal-watching peninsula, which turned out to be a tiny room inside a small building, and realized that the Whale Museum was actually gigantic!

Most of the exhibits in the national museum system were historic sites, such as the turf houses in the second photo below. Only the Iceland National Museum in Reykjavik resembles the stereotypical idea of a "museum" (third photo below).




At the supermarket or regular store check-out, there was no bagging service so you either bring your bag or get one of their tiny thin plastic bags yourself. Over the 10-day trip, I don't remember seeing any Styrofoam product for food or drink. The majority of the automobiles on the road were the smallest models from various makers and rarely did I see any car from a luxury brand, not even in the capital city. My overall impression was that the whole lifestyle was geared toward conservation of resources.

Interestingly, the largest man-made structures we saw were the geothermal power plants, including the one in the photos below near the volcanic crater Viti. The geology of Iceland offers an abundance of the natural energy source, at least more than sufficient to support the Icelandic population. From what we could see, residents outside of the capital city maintained a rather simple farming/ranching lifestyle anyway. As tourists, we were definitely grateful that the numerous majestic waterfalls were not tapped for power generation. 



Clean and Neat 
The restrooms (called WC or toilet) were not always present at the places we visited, but all of them were spotless and stink-free regardless of how remote the locations were. This is a (good) departure from what we are used to in the National Park System in the states, but the responsibilities rest, with the tourists as much as the National Park Services.

Below are two of the cute restrooms we "visited" on the trip. The first set of restroom stalls (triangles on the left) were located in a small island with no permanent residents, specifically for the use by the tourist group coming to visit on the daily boat tour. I was really surprised to find it as clean as possible because that meant that somebody had to be driving a boat for about an hour each way to clean the stalls regularly!

The restroom in the second photo below had a funny shape and a retro-styled turf roof where grass and flowers were allowed to grow, which should have kept the restroom relatively warm in the winter and cool under the summer sun. 



Another observation was that all of the eating places were also spotless and do not smell like food or anything else. I suspect that it was at least partly due to the less greasy cooking style of Icelandic cuisine. But it's obvious that the overall standard for cleanliness is just higher in Iceland than in all other countries I have been to.

In my other post about the food experience in Iceland, I included some photos of the restaurants we went to. Here are the pictures I took of the breakfast rooms at some of our hotels around the island.






Trust
For lack of a better word,I'm calling this section "trust," as in the opposite of excessive concern about certain things.

In contrast to the standard of hygiene for the dining rooms, Icelanders don't seem to be as concerned about germs from the human hands. Whenever bread is offered in the buffet (for breakfast or dinner), no serving utensils were provided. I guess it's reasonable to expect every guest to refrain from touching any piece of bread that he/she is not taking. But when the whole loaf of bread was served, I had no choice but to hold the loaf with one hand while using the knife with the other. Having been "well-trained" in Taiwan and the states, I couldn't help but feel guilty to be contaminating the loaf with my germs! At the same time, though, it infused me with a sense of nostalgia for the simpler way of life when people didn't have to guard against one another so much, and when the store keeper would take my saved-up coins and hand me the bulk candy in an old dusty jar.

In the picture below, we were on our way back to the hard on the whale-watching boat. We were offered hot chocolate and cinnamon rolls as it was pretty cold and we had been at sea for 3 hours. You can see that the tour guide was serving the rolls by hand. 


In a few places frequented by tourists, we saw little donation jars for people to chip in for nature/history conservation or service enhancement but they were left in public places with no supervision whatsoever. One of them was on the shelve in a restroom stall, with the whole lid open and nothing inside. But the others I saw were not empty.

On our eighth night, we stayed at a little inn, probably converted from a private residence. The hostess had left for home before we arrived that night, so she left the front door to the building open and left us a note with the room key on the counter. 

I suspect that these trusting behaviors may be somewhat related to the fact that Iceland has long been a small country with a small population. If people know one another, they may behave better and expect others to behave similarly based on the common social norms. 

As tourists, we felt completely independent and free to do what we wanted wherever we went. The Icelanders clearly value freedom more than the need to restrict tourists' behaviors for safety. In other words, they trust the tourists to protect themselves! For example, there was no fencing at any coastal cliff, tall waterfall, or canyon walls. I probably would have had numerous panic attacks if we brought little kids to any of those places, where the possibilities of accidents were endless. Some of our photos make those places look rather scary afterwards...





                        
Communicating with pictures
I may be imagining things here, but I think the Icelanders love to communicate with pictures. Take road signs as examples, a lot of them had no words (in any language) and thus require some imagination on the part of the interpreter.

We drove past this cute little dragon sign posted by a lake. Along with the picnic sign, I interpreted it to mean: Here's a good spot for having a picnic while looking at the lake, which is the lake where the monster was said to reside. Somebody on the internet offered an alternative interpretation: This is a good spot for having a picnic while observing the lake monster. 


On the first day, we drove by a couple small towns and noticed this sign below, with the houses and church crossed out. No settlement allowed?


Then we started to pay more attention and realized that the sign below would appear as we entered the boundary of a town/village, and then the sign above would appear as we left the town boundary!  We also concluded that the signs for different towns were the same, with the same number of houses and a church, regardless of how big the town was. But on the last day, we saw that the city boundary sign for the capital city, Reykjavik, had one additional house in the sign! After all, almost 3/4 of the Icelanders do live in the capital.


Once we know what the city/town boundary signs mean, it is now possible to interpret the partially obstructed sign above, behind the "end of town" sign. I found a complete version from the web to explain, see below.

During our ten-day driving tour, we saw this warning sign below many times. Fortunately it was pretty straight forward: Single-lane narrow bridge ahead! Once you pass the sign, there will be a passing point where the shoulder is slightly wider for you to wait for the on-coming car to cross the bridge first.


The set of signs in the picture below is not as clear to me. By now I knew that the symbol similar to a four-leave clover in the middle indicated a landmark or place of interest. The top graph might mean that only pedestrians and bicycles can continue forward (but not motor vehicles). But does it apply to the trail on the left or the one on the right? The left trail led to a private rancher's property but there was a passage way to get to the historic turf houses site. The right trail actually led directly to the historic site. Finally, the bottom graph was really puzzling to me: Only pedestrians can take the right trail? 

Sometimes the signs do have English, like the one below. Clearly the graphic representation of the fecal matter was not necessary but an attempt for comic effects? We've only seen this once on the trip.


When the words on a sign were Icelandic, of course the picture becomes crucial for us, such as the one below. The meaning of this gigantic sign was clear enough, but I did not notice the number printed on the cross at the time. According to some sources I found, it is the accumulated number of people died from car accidents in the current year in the whole country.


Playing with rocks
If I have to pick the most impressive feature of Icelandic beauty, I would say it's the rocks. The most awe-inspiring places to me were the rock formations and creations that became canyons, cliffs, and contours of the mountains. It was the unique rocky background that distinguished each of the Icelandic waterfalls.

But rocks on a much smaller scale were interesting in Iceland as well. They were like the national toys! A restaurant owner displays the heart-shaped rock collection in the first two pictures; the enormous glacier deity was built with rocks in the third photo.





Hikers know how critical the cairns can be in staying on track when the trails are not clear. The convention is that hikers would add rocks to the cairns as continuous maintenance of the trail markers. Bob loves doing it and often challenges himself with difficult stacks.



In one particular place, the Icelanders have taken the cairn building tradition to a new height. At the site of an ancient farm that was destroyed (more than a thousand years ago) by a the first eruption of volcano Katla, each Icelander passing by the site for the first time was supposed to contribute one rock to a cairn as a gesture of wishing the dead good luck in their journey after life. The Iceland road administration regularly transports new rocks to this site so that modern tourists can continue the tradition!




There were also more realistic rock stacks that resemble human or animal shapes. Some of them were simplistic, as in the first two photos below, others were mind-boggling, such as the one in the third picture, captured from a far distance while we were driving to the airport on the last day. The rocks must have been huge so how did people move them around to stack them?




Bob had the most fun stacking rocks on the eighth day when we visited a famous rock arch by the coast. As we approached the rocky beach, I saw many big white birds standing on a group of black rocks by the beach. But then I realized that the completely still white birds were actually stones standing freely on their pointy ends. Driven by my curiosity, I touched one of the standing rocks and broke its balance! Oops!!

After Bob had taken enough photos of the stone arch, he came over to try his hand on making rocks stand. He got it rather quickly and soon started to add to the existing collection with rocks that were increasingly difficult to balance. In the end, he restored the one I knocked down and created a two-rock creation with a small one on top of a larger one.

This was the existing collection when we arrived there.



My guilty look after knocking down a balanced rock

Some of Bob's contributions



The collection as we left it

I captured a few of the rock stacking attempts on video, including this one below: